<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend links: Stuff worth a look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/06/27/weekend-links-stuff-worth-a-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/06/27/weekend-links-stuff-worth-a-look/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: viveksh</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/06/27/weekend-links-stuff-worth-a-look/comment-page-1/#comment-143905</link>
		<dc:creator>viveksh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/?p=2625#comment-143905</guid>
		<description>Note that adjusting down by $365B / year (the trade surplus of $1B / day cited above) is not a lot for the US economy. The savings rate in the US was 0 and has shot up to 6.7% this year. That percentage of the GDP is ~ $1T / year. 

&quot;Chinese leaders have deliberately held down living standards for their own people&quot; - that is the real problem and it amounts to keeping the yuan low against the dollar. The implications of sudden changes are way larger on China that on US contrary to popular opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that adjusting down by $365B / year (the trade surplus of $1B / day cited above) is not a lot for the US economy. The savings rate in the US was 0 and has shot up to 6.7% this year. That percentage of the GDP is ~ $1T / year. </p>
<p>&#8220;Chinese leaders have deliberately held down living standards for their own people&#8221; &#8211; that is the real problem and it amounts to keeping the yuan low against the dollar. The implications of sudden changes are way larger on China that on US contrary to popular opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

