<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not the News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/01/25/not-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/01/25/not-the-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amity</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/01/25/not-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-137233</link>
		<dc:creator>amity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/?p=1529#comment-137233</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Ghost. Yes, C-SPAN was an excellent source to get information during the elections without the spin and blather from so-called media pundits, and gives more opportunity to the viewer to make up his own mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Ghost. Yes, C-SPAN was an excellent source to get information during the elections without the spin and blather from so-called media pundits, and gives more opportunity to the viewer to make up his own mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/01/25/not-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-137197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/?p=1529#comment-137197</guid>
		<description>Atanu - also do not forget C-SPAN (if you have watched that while in the US). I am a total C-SPAN junkie - they have some of the best guests and the whole thing is entirely non-partisan. No one cuts each other off and discussions are really well developed.
I took an idea for low-budget, high quality programming to an investor once - they laughed me out of the building. But I think the space is ripe in India for at least a dozen C-SPAN type channels - one in each of the major language markets. Sadly nobody in India will fund it - everyone is too busy developing saas-bahu crap and mind numbing banality in the name of network news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atanu &#8211; also do not forget C-SPAN (if you have watched that while in the US). I am a total C-SPAN junkie &#8211; they have some of the best guests and the whole thing is entirely non-partisan. No one cuts each other off and discussions are really well developed.<br />
I took an idea for low-budget, high quality programming to an investor once &#8211; they laughed me out of the building. But I think the space is ripe in India for at least a dozen C-SPAN type channels &#8211; one in each of the major language markets. Sadly nobody in India will fund it &#8211; everyone is too busy developing saas-bahu crap and mind numbing banality in the name of network news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amity</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2009/01/25/not-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-137196</link>
		<dc:creator>amity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/?p=1529#comment-137196</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the reasons I don&#039;t get news from TV, as the format with ticker-tape, breaking news etc. most likely leads to ADHD which can&#039;t be good. It&#039;s such a jumble and so confusing, and leads to knee-jerk reactions to events.

As for PBS, it&#039;s mostly funded by government, viewer donations and some corporations (with very limited ads - they just mention the name at the beginning and at the end).

So seems like we have a contradiction. :)

Free-market leads to stupid news format as competition to be ahead forces producers to come up with meaningless gimmicks, whereas government funded programs maintain their better standards.

Data suggests there&#039;s a give-and-take involved here between news standards and money, not unlike Heisenberg&#039;s Uncertainty Principle. If you can figure out a way to keep higher standards *and* fund such news and programs on TV using free market economy, let us know. *grin*

I think we&#039;re simply getting addicted to &quot;information&quot; as our brains need constant stimulation, and it takes some discipline to place limits on the amount as well as nature of that information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons I don&#8217;t get news from TV, as the format with ticker-tape, breaking news etc. most likely leads to ADHD which can&#8217;t be good. It&#8217;s such a jumble and so confusing, and leads to knee-jerk reactions to events.</p>
<p>As for PBS, it&#8217;s mostly funded by government, viewer donations and some corporations (with very limited ads &#8211; they just mention the name at the beginning and at the end).</p>
<p>So seems like we have a contradiction. <img src='http://www.deeshaa.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Free-market leads to stupid news format as competition to be ahead forces producers to come up with meaningless gimmicks, whereas government funded programs maintain their better standards.</p>
<p>Data suggests there&#8217;s a give-and-take involved here between news standards and money, not unlike Heisenberg&#8217;s Uncertainty Principle. If you can figure out a way to keep higher standards *and* fund such news and programs on TV using free market economy, let us know. *grin*</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re simply getting addicted to &#8220;information&#8221; as our brains need constant stimulation, and it takes some discipline to place limits on the amount as well as nature of that information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

