<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About the ISB Event &#8212; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shivani</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-132349</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/#comment-132349</guid>
		<description>No post on details of  presentation done by Manish?  the readers are curious  to know ...      : - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No post on details of  presentation done by Manish?  the readers are curious  to know &#8230;      : &#8211; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idlinginc</title>
		<link>http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-132071</link>
		<dc:creator>idlinginc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/11/14/about-the-isb-event-part-2/#comment-132071</guid>
		<description>Not relevant to the current post (but can&#039;t comment on the ToI link):

&quot;The Times of India published three articles which praised the Quran during the Petition controversy. Goel claims that a rebuttal to these articles could not be published in the Times of India. Goel claims that the chief editor, Girilal Jain, regretted his inability to do so for reasons he could not reveal.&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not relevant to the current post (but can&#8217;t comment on the ToI link):</p>
<p>&#8220;The Times of India published three articles which praised the Quran during the Petition controversy. Goel claims that a rebuttal to these articles could not be published in the Times of India. Goel claims that the chief editor, Girilal Jain, regretted his inability to do so for reasons he could not reveal.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

