Comments on: Open Question http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Joker http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104771 Joker Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:07:52 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104771 Caeser salad is above suspicion. Caeser the king is suspicious. Caeser's wife is meeting Guru Gulab Khatri this weekend. Caeser salad is above suspicion.
Caeser the king is suspicious.
Caeser’s wife is meeting Guru Gulab Khatri this weekend.

]]> By: jala http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104241 jala Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:58:24 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104241 Whoever has conscience, will try to stay above suspicion. Caeser had it, but Cleopatra didn't. Of course, your question is a leading one, :) Whoever has conscience, will try to stay above suspicion.

Caeser had it, but Cleopatra didn’t.

Of course, your question is a leading one, :)

]]> By: Anuj http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104164 Anuj Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:10:36 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104164 Are Sonia and Pratibha having a "thing"? Are Sonia and Pratibha having a “thing”?

]]> By: Anuj http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104163 Anuj Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:10:10 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104163 Are Sonia and Pratibha having a "thing"? Are Sonia and Pratibha having a “thing”?

]]> By: Sarat http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104155 Sarat Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:37:38 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104155 If Caeser himself is below suspicion then its only fair to expect Caesar's wife to be so too. Infact the question about Caeser's wife becomes irrelevant in this scenario. When something fails the primary test, the secondary test becomes irrelevant for it is there merely to confirm the result of the primary test, if succeeded. If Caeser himself is below suspicion then its only fair to expect Caesar’s wife to be so too. Infact the question about Caeser’s wife becomes irrelevant in this scenario. When something fails the primary test, the secondary test becomes irrelevant for it is there merely to confirm the result of the primary test, if succeeded.

]]> By: shiv http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104150 shiv Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:10:31 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104150 What exactly is below suspicion ? Proven guilty ? Irrespective of the semantics, the statement above needs greater clarity. The question here is are the first 2 sentences are linked. ie one concedes that cesar's wife is above suspicion if and only if cesar is. In which case the wife will screw around if cesar does. (of course he does) The original context was sexual, ie cesar's wife should be above the suspicion of cohabiting with someone else. As far as i know there was no such restrictions on her spouse. Nor was it exptected. This statement makes me reflect on gender equations and how much our society has changed in the last millenium...Thanks. What exactly is below suspicion ? Proven guilty ? Irrespective of the semantics, the statement above needs greater clarity. The question here is are the first 2 sentences are linked. ie one concedes that cesar’s wife is above suspicion if and only if cesar is. In which case the wife will screw around if cesar does. (of course he does) The original context was sexual, ie cesar’s wife should be above the suspicion of cohabiting with someone else. As far as i know there was no such restrictions on her spouse. Nor was it exptected. This statement makes me reflect on gender equations and how much our society has changed in the last millenium…Thanks.

]]> By: Sudipta Chatterjee http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104134 Sudipta Chatterjee Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:14:18 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104134 Missing the reference here, Atanu :( Can you please skip the allegory if someone doesn't post it here? Otherwise, Amit Das's answer above seems good. Missing the reference here, Atanu :( Can you please skip the allegory if someone doesn’t post it here? Otherwise, Amit Das’s answer above seems good.

]]> By: Seriously Sandeep » Just Say No http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104103 Seriously Sandeep » Just Say No Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:34:00 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104103 [...] Just Say No Others saying no: The Acorn | Offstumped | Barbar Indian | Atanu | Amit Varma | This entry was written by Sandeep and [...] [...]

Just Say No

Others saying no: The Acorn | Offstumped | Barbar Indian | Atanu | Amit Varma |

This entry was written by Sandeep and [...]

]]> By: Amit Das http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/comment-page-1/#comment-104095 Amit Das Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:47:52 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2007/06/27/open-question/#comment-104095 Aren't Ceaser and his wife independent of each other? especially, in certain contexts? Also, its possible that Ceaser's interests are in conflict with his wife's interests. In such a case, won't Ceaser being way below suspicion may actually prove that Ceaser's wife is beyond suspicion? Aren’t Ceaser and his wife independent of each other? especially, in certain contexts? Also, its possible that Ceaser’s interests are in conflict with his wife’s interests. In such a case, won’t Ceaser being way below suspicion may actually prove that Ceaser’s wife is beyond suspicion?

]]>