Comments on: “Free” Energy? Not Really — Part 2 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: viren http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37523 viren Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:26:52 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/#comment-37523 good good

]]> By: shaffu http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21761 shaffu Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:51:23 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/#comment-21761 Genuine Internet Job Work. Work From Home and Earn Thousands. Thinking of joining any Ad Typing Company free!! Then this one is for you!! Which offers free home based job work opportunity. No Investment, register your account and start for free! Never before on the internet, don't miss this wonderful opportunity. Get details at: www.homepagepublicity.com/earn4free.asp?referer=159691 Genuine Internet Job Work. Work From Home and Earn Thousands.

Thinking of joining any Ad Typing Company free!!
Then this one is for you!! Which offers free home based job work opportunity.
No Investment, register your account and start for free!

Never before on the internet, don’t miss this wonderful opportunity.

Get details at: http://www.homepagepublicity.com/earn4free.asp?referer=159691

]]> By: Atanu Dey on India’s Development » “Free” Energy? Not Really — Part 3 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19989 Atanu Dey on India’s Development » “Free” Energy? Not Really — Part 3 Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:18:30 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/#comment-19989 [...] o comments Permalink [Previous Posts on “Free Energy”: Part 1, Part 2] Keith Hudson, the author of the outstanding Daily Wisdom postings, rec [...] [...] o comments
Permalink

[Previous Posts on “Free Energy”: Part 1, Part 2] Keith Hudson, the author of the outstanding Daily Wisdom postings, rec [...]

]]> By: Girish Mallapragada http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19975 Girish Mallapragada Sun, 27 Aug 2006 03:06:51 +0000 http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/08/27/free-energy-not-really-part-2/#comment-19975 Absolute truth is "absolute". The physical universe is not a conception of human intellect but is an aboslute. We can only ascribe characteristics to it which fall under the realm of human understanding, and science enables us to do this. However, our conception of the physical universe is largely based on what we observe, and to be fair to science, that's the best we can do. However, what we really know is very little and what possibly lies out there is huge. Imagining impossible things (within the constraints of our understanding) need not be be "magic". There is a scientifc process which enables us humans to theorize and imagine the impossible (akin to Einstien single handedly theorizing the space-time continuum). Perpetual motion machines are an impossiobility given the constraints of the inherent duality of matter and energy. It is one nature's fundamental laws. However, it is our "realization" of an absolute truth that underlies this behavior. What theories are for is to push this understanding by creating boundaries and constraints to this observed behavior. That is what Einstein did when he reshaped our understading of Newtonian laws. Currently, there is little which can push this duality between matter and energy. Finally, I also have to add that we have greater problems dealing with mere fossil fuels before we can even get to these PMMs. What is logical, is still based on the dominant conceptions of reality. New evidence in science has trumped dominant logic time and again. It might be wishful thinking from my part to imagine PMM's, but the hope that is of at least a clean energy (if not free) is a rational and non-magical one. Absolute truth is “absolute”. The physical universe is not a conception of human intellect but is an aboslute. We can only ascribe characteristics to it which fall under the realm of human understanding, and science enables us to do this. However, our conception of the physical universe is largely based on what we observe, and to be fair to science, that’s the best we can do. However, what we really know is very little and what possibly lies out there is huge. Imagining impossible things (within the constraints of our understanding) need not be be “magic”. There is a scientifc process which enables us humans to theorize and imagine the impossible (akin to Einstien single handedly theorizing the space-time continuum).

Perpetual motion machines are an impossiobility given the constraints of the inherent duality of matter and energy. It is one nature’s fundamental laws. However, it is our “realization” of an absolute truth that underlies this behavior.

What theories are for is to push this understanding by creating boundaries and constraints to this observed behavior. That is what Einstein did when he reshaped our understading of Newtonian laws. Currently, there is little which can push this duality between matter and energy.

Finally, I also have to add that we have greater problems dealing with mere fossil fuels before we can even get to these PMMs.

What is logical, is still based on the dominant conceptions of reality. New evidence in science has trumped dominant logic time and again.

It might be wishful thinking from my part to imagine PMM’s, but the hope that is of at least a clean energy (if not free) is a rational and non-magical one.

]]>