Sunil i would like to correct you, you said that “In that sense I do not think any of the present leaders of India Pakistan and USA are “bad” “.Well that would be wrong if President of USA ,were not bad that why selling arms to India and Pakistan.US shouldn’t sell arms to anyone.I know if they don’t then India and Pakistan would look for alternatives but US is a world power at present so if they dont sell that would have and effect for sure.What i feel is whatever US does is for its own interest(every country will do the same) but being a word power means something.Now i only see US as a terrorist state that attacks anyone at its own will.Thay have broken every treaty and they ask others to sign it.What i feel , US is a terrorist/rogue state which has power in its hand and can influence any country in world.They don’t give a dam about supporting poor nations,all they want is supermacy, edge over other countries and a strong economy at any cost.Also US is the most scared nation, they attacked Iraq on name of weapons of mass destruction, they knew that Iraq have none so they attacked.They will never attack Korea,Iran because these countries have nuclear weapons.

Being a power means something so US should realize its responsibility in this wold of chaos and stop selling weapons because finally these weapons will be used against US only.Like Osama and Saddam.If you dont know US is father of Osama and Saddam,Osama was to repell Russian invasion and US+Saddam fought war against Syria and they used chemical weapons.

Thanks
AD

I chanced upon ur blog from Rajesh Jain’s website.I have been reading ur blogs occasionally..I found this one interesting.We in India routinely call Pakistan a “Terrorist state”.Infact all major communication media in India refer to Pakistan as a terrorist/failed state.And its become so common that u dont notice it.And without thinking ,i forwarded it to my colleagues.And one of my colleague was a pakistani and u can imagine the mess that I was in!!! My point is if u think about it,labelling a country a terrorist state is some real serious charge..And any reference that we make to Pakistan is always accompanied by this “appendage”,so much so that any serious article that we write even though it makes sense becomes a rant against Pakistan..Arent we being hypocritical…From ur very article isnt US more of a “terrorist” state than Pakistan..I dont see anybody calling US this.How can we improve relations with Pakistan when we keep calling them this..I dont want Pakistan to become a terrorist/failed state.Thats not good for India.ANd it doesnt help when we jump from our rooftops and point fingers at Pakistan everytime there is an attack anywhere in the world.Heck US has considered them as an ally,so what’s pissing us off.On one hand we want to have good relations with Pakistan and on other hand we keep calling them a terrorist state..I know that calling Pakistan a failed state(in some myopic way) makes us feel good,but that doesnt solve the problem..

Very insightful and that explains a lot. The cycle of money is interesting. We are forced to sponsor their economy by buying weapons from them (big money). Then in the form of USAID, Plan International etc etc , they give us monetary grants (peanuts) to prop up our economy. Never mind that inspite of making the right noises, there seems to be no impact on our poverty alleviation. But guess who comes out looking good – ethically and financially? No prizes for guessing!

I want know about the the inflated dollar. i don’t believe this equation of $1=Rs45. i am sure it is half that. some one said that america has issued treasury bonds to chinese and japan banks. and china and japan don’t want the dollar to decrease.

while american media is so screwed up in portraying realities.

leave alone their skewed foriegn policy and
UN policy. no country in the world should have
veto power, UN needs to strengthed and
need to be more fair.