Comments on: Numbers – 5 http://www.deeshaa.org/2004/08/02/numbers-5-2/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Atanu Dey on India’s Development » Numbers — 4 http://www.deeshaa.org/2004/08/02/numbers-5-2/comment-page-1/#comment-97922 Atanu Dey on India’s Development » Numbers — 4 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:42:05 +0000 http://home.blogstreet.com/2004/08/02/175#comment-97922 [...] op"> Previous post: « HMS Titanic — 4 Next post: Numbers – 5 » 31. Jul '04 9:30 am [...] [...] op”>

Previous post: « HMS Titanic — 4
Next post: Numbers – 5 »

31. Jul ‘04 9:30 am
[...]

]]> By: Venu Gopal http://www.deeshaa.org/2004/08/02/numbers-5-2/comment-page-1/#comment-337 Venu Gopal Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://home.blogstreet.com/2004/08/02/175#comment-337 Perhaps there is an alternative to your theory of overpopulation being the basis of our poverty. What is your response to this? http://www.reason.com/rb/rb072804.shtml Perhaps there is an alternative to your theory of overpopulation being the basis of our poverty.

What is your response to this?

http://www.reason.com/rb/rb072804.shtml

]]> By: Walker http://www.deeshaa.org/2004/08/02/numbers-5-2/comment-page-1/#comment-338 Walker Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://home.blogstreet.com/2004/08/02/175#comment-338 Venu, that article only discusses (and attempts to debunk) another article that links food availability with population size. There is no analysis present on whether or not population size (in India, or anywhere else) contributes to poverty. There is no "alternative" theory presented anywhere in the article. In framing the substance of the article the author makes it clear that he thinks talk of "overpopulation" in the theoretical sense is rubbish -- which is a fine opinion, but otherwise it seems only peripherally related to the topic at hand. Venu, that article only discusses (and attempts to debunk) another article that links food availability with population size. There is no analysis present on whether or not population size (in India, or anywhere else) contributes to poverty. There is no “alternative” theory presented anywhere in the article. In framing the substance of the article the author makes it clear that he thinks talk of “overpopulation” in the theoretical sense is rubbish — which is a fine opinion, but otherwise it seems only peripherally related to the topic at hand.

]]> By: Jane http://www.deeshaa.org/2004/08/02/numbers-5-2/comment-page-1/#comment-339 Jane Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://home.blogstreet.com/2004/08/02/175#comment-339 Greeting I have posted some excerpts of your post on my blog: http://armiesofliberation.com/archives/2004/08/25/many-poor-indians/ Greeting I have posted some excerpts of your post on my blog:
http://armiesofliberation.com/archives/2004/08/25/many-poor-indians/

]]>